-3-

.

The measurement of body radiation by such analysis is very sensitive and re-

quires complex electronic equipment and personnel highly trained in electronics ©
from Brookhaven National Laboratory.
3.

Personnel exposure to gamma radiation: Gamma levels on the island

were derived from data furnished by other radiological survey groups.
MONITORING DATA

The results of the personnel monitoring data on people Living at Bikini
since 1969 are presented in the accompanying tables.

analyses are oresented on Table I.

The data on urine

Note that average pCi/liter for Bikini

urine compared with Rongelap was for 705. 2.5/3.8 and for 13765 638/3360.
Based on standard guide lines (International Congress of Radiation Protection ICRP) these isotopes have been well below maximum permissible levels.

assuring also is the virtual absence of plutonium in the samples.

Re-

Levels

for internally absorbed 13705 as measured by spectrographic analyses are
presented in Table 2.

Note the average values for males and females on

Bikini compared with those on Rengelap (in nCi/pg body weight) was 1.4/6.4,
again well below the maximum permissible levels.

The graphs in figures 1

iad 2 show that bedy burden (extrapolated) for 905, and 13705 in the Bikini
people are well belowthe peak values noted in the Rongelap people.

The

Rongelap people reached a peak of 6-11% of the maximum 90... permissible
level (for general populations) and of about 22% for 13765.

These Low

values for internally absorbed radionuclides is in accord with the fact
that the people on Bikini have been subsisting mainly on imported foads.
The contribution of gamma radiation to the people on Bikini is somewhat
greater than on Rongelap.

arenVenema
. mg
.
LOTdo
‘
‘

1
°

SEP me pea or en tba
5
oF
tS
.

ae

.
SO ee me meme nee =
hoe,
a
.

Select target paragraph3