Table B-2. Comparison of results from the 1978 Aerial SUrV@Y and Terrestrial Survey for 137¢5 specific activities in surface soils on Iroij {stand (B-2). Field ____SCssud activity number location B-2 contour 3770-75 3776-81 3794-99 Site 265 Site 266 Site 268 C D B log Site 261 3608-13 3614-19 3626-30 3602-07 3782-87 (pCi/g)4 Q.5-1.1 1.1-2.0 0.2-0.5 # 1.1-2.0 0 * G Site 263 Site 257 Site 264 B C D Site 267 3788-93 Aerial Survey label4 Site 262 Site 260 3620-25 0-10 cm EG&G 6.0-8.0 6.0-8.0 G 0.2-0.5 0.5-1.1 1.1-2.0 0.5-1.1 C Survey (pCi/g) 0.64 1.0 0.24 1.2 15 7 0.20 0.23 1.2 0.68 3.7 Average NOTE. 0-10 cm Terrestrial Sampling sites are shown Specific activity is decay corrected to 1987. in Fig. A-4. 4a Concentration-contour labels and ranges are from Tipton gpg Meibaum (1981). Table B-3. Comparison of results from the 1978 Aerial Survey and Terrestrial Survey for !3/Cs specific activities in surface soils on Odrik Island (B-3): Field log number B-3 location 3478-83 3490-95 3496-01 3740-45 3746-50 Site Site Site Site site 269 270 273 27) 272 EG&G contour label B B Cc D C NSCs 041 activity 0-10 cm Aerial Survey (pCi/g)? 0.2-0.5 0.2-0.5 0.5-1.] 1.1-2.0 0.5-1.1 Average NOTE: Specific activity is decay corrected to 1987. aS 0-10 cm Terrestrial Survey (pCi/g) 0.56 0.39 1.0 1.4 0.09 0.68 ee Sampling sites are shown in Fig. A-5. a Concentration-contour labels and ranges are from Tipton and Meibaum (1981). B-3