exhibit large fallout peaks.
The calibration factor obtained
in the laboratory using a standard radium source was consistent

with that inferred from the field ionization chamber values.*

Dose rates can also be inferred from the portable scintillation counters used to survey the site area,
These instruments
are equipped with count rate meters and the dependence of their
response on environmental conditions and incident gamma ray

energy is such that they are not suitable for direct dose rate
calibration.
The instruments can, however, be “field calibrated"

against the ion chamber by plotting the readings of each instrument in a given area against the corresponding terrestrial dose
rates obtained from the ionization chamber data.
The calibration curve thus obtained may be used to interpret readings of
the portable scintillation counter in terms of dose rate for

any location in the area as well as to detect any spurious ionization chamber readings.
For each location a "best" value of terrestrial dose rate
was calculated by averaging the ionization chamber and total
spectrum energy values,
The dose rates inferred from the portable instruments were usually used only as a check since these
values are generally not as precise as the values obtained
from the other two methods,
Natural Gamma

Two methods: of spectrum analysis are used to obtain estimates of the dose rate contributions from the three major natural contributors to the terrestrial gamma radiation field.

The first method is based on the assumption that the estimated
area under a total absorption peak characteristic of the u238
series (1.76 Mev), Th232 series (2.62 MeV), and K40 (1.46 Mev)
is directly proportional to the total dose rate contribution
from all the gamma rays of the parent emitter or series of
emitters.
Laboratory studies of the variation of estimated
peak counts as a function of primary flux and angle were carried
out for various standard monoenergetic sources using the laboratory background spectrum to simulate the field situation.
The
information obtained from these experiments was combined with
calculations of the angular distribution of primary flux and

the total dose rate per unit primary flux for the various emit-

ters, assuming known decay schemes and uniform source distributions in the ground, to arrive at a conversion factor from

i
4

Select target paragraph3