Tabie i2 Padionuclide concentration in the ereundawater or fikini and =neu Isianas Bikini Concentration~ 375, ~ime Ratio 3Ci/t 20. (>C4/1) 739,240, (ECL/1) 238/239, 240, ‘well sampled Sol Fart Sol Part Sol HFH 1 (0840) (1145) (1545) ~80 529 295 7.9 12.9 LE.9 87(1) 46(1) 38(1) 1.31 9.57 0.48 40.0 5.9 3.7 SFH 2 294 12.9 77 1.37 7.3 HFH 3 235 3.3 227 338.2 HFH 4 225 a) 260 39 23.2 AFH 5 330 3.5 180 25.6 13.4(12) 0.004 (60) HFH 7 250 3.8 0.8 2.0(22) 0.022 (30) 1.0 Part Sol 3.3(13) 1.3(32) 1.9(21) 71,3(4) 3.4(10) 0.026(9) <0.004 <0.004 Q.04 (35) <0.008 <0.001 Eneu . Concentration Time sampled Sol FWR 1 0835 1250 35.3(1) 30 (1) FWR 2 EWR 38. 3B FWR 4 Q 13705 pCi/1) Well a 205, (pci/1) Part Sol Part 1.17(2) 0.73(3) 71 (cy 45.6(1) Q.81 0.56 59.1(1) 9.95(3) 66 270 (3) 0.49(¢5) 1.0(9) 1.105) 0.57(2) 3.4(5) (2) 32 (2) 0.59(2)-1.313)——0.03 0.11 4S01 = soluble fraction, Part = particulate fraction. > “3954 (£Ci/1) Sol Part 3.5(6) 3.3(8) 9.5 1.6 (10) (22) 23.54) 8.4 (17) 0.72(22) 1.42(16) 0.32(30) 1.1 (15) 0.85(18) 0.67(27) The values in paren- theses are the 1-0 counting errors expressed as percentages of the listed values. bg = surface, B = bottom. The data used, therefcre, to evalu- Radiation Ecology, University of ate the potential dose via the marine Washington. Table 16 lists the fish food chain was obtained irom published data used in the dose assessment. data 8,30 and from unpublished data Table 17 lists the data on clams. supplied through the courtesy of average concentration of the radio-~ Dr. Vic Nelson of the Laboratory of nuclides were derermined from the data The