°

6

Ct.

target afforded by the cell chromosomes.

"

ir

This follows necessarily from

the fact that most alpha interactions with ceil chromosomes lead to the

(17,18)

subsequent mitotic death of the cell, as Barendsen has shown

The

production of a malignant cell calls for a sequence of two or more low
probability events and thus cannot be speeded up by the application of .
massive alpha doses, but rather only by subjecting a much larger number

of cells to a limited number of interactions.

Additionally, assuming that

the tumor risk to the tissue subjected to alpha irradiation is proportional

to Re (e/TDs expiained above, it is apparent that the- alpha activity
concentration or the activity per particle which is eauated to a given

tumor risk decreases with increasing time of exposure and also that 4 given
risk can be attributed to smaller cumulative doses when the time of exposure
t ir appreciably longer than the mean life of the cell, To.

Brues ‘27? and

Burch (28) both pointed out that the two-mutation theories of carcinosepesis

(20,21)

would imply an exceptionally high effectiveness of widely

spaced radiation for tumor production.

It is proposed that just such a

‘dose rate relationship serves to reconcile the observed significant tumor

risk in cigarette smokers with the presence of a persistent lung burden of
insoluble smoke particles: involving a total of only a few picocurirs of
2120p, (14) |

3.

?

2

“Hot” Pud,, Particle Risks:

If the above tentative conclusions are

correct, then the same considerations must apply in the assessment of
tumor risks for hot particles.

In this connection a preliminary considera-

tion of the influence of specific alpha activity and particle size of the
hot
-

alpha emitting particles is in order.

1

Raabe et al. 62%) report an apparent rate of dissolution of ***Pu0,

dn lung fluid which is two orders of magnitude higher than that observed
for ***Pud, particles.

Such a dramatic difference in the chemical behavior

Select target paragraph3