cleanup phase of the program. (DEIS, Vol. I, pp. 5-79, 6-5) Even af the Task Group is enlarged as we have sugyested and specific coil standards are developed and implementel, will perform a crucial function. membership be carefully selected. this monitoring group Thus, it is important that its It is imperative that radio-~ ecientists of the most conservative cast be included in the monitoring group. Here again, we suggest that the names of Drs. Martell, Geesaman, Tamplin and Cochran. Arid the on-site authority of the monitoring group should be clearly defined, with all important or unexpected problems to be referred to the enlarged Task Group. 3.6. Test Plantings, GroundwaterandAir Sampling We are in full agreement with the AEC Task Group recommendations for test pluntings, lens water and air sampling. pp. 5-80 to 5-81.) (Vol. I, But it is not clear whether these recommenda- tions have been implemented. They must be and the studies should be commissioned to the best scientists and technicians available, under the over-all guidance of the enlarged Task Group. All of these studies must’ deal explicitly with the hot particle problem. 3.7. Radicbiological Health Followup AEC Task Group recommendation 12 (Vol. 1, p. 5-81) calls for "Baseline surveys of body burdens and urine content of Cs-137 and Sr-90... for the Enewetak people prior to return to Enewetak Atoll, and periodically thereafter." But here, too, it is not clear whether a firm commitment to long-range radiological health monitoring ef the Enewetak population has been made, and, if so, .